Yay! Thanks everyone involved, especially Donald and Nick.
On 22 October 2013 23:05, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > For those distutils-sig residents that don't follow python-dev, a > certain PEP was formally accepted today :) > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> > Date: 22 October 2013 19:33 > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated > To: Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>, "python-...@python.org" > <python-...@python.org> > > > Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > > I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. > > This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4. > > I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and I'd like to > cite it as an archetype for a well-written PEP. It's very precise, and > it elaborates on rejected proposals and the motivation for rejection. > > I'd also like to thank Donald for pushing this, and for continued work > on the implementation of the PEP. I see that this all took longer than > expected (also due to my fault in providing timely reviews). I suggest > that some of the stuff that needs to be done still is delegated, so that > Donald doesn't have to do all of it. > > Regards, > Martin > > > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig