On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I wouldn't want that kind of bad PR getting around about > scientific Python "Python is slower than Matlab" etc. > Well, is that better or worse that 2% or less people finding they can't run it on their old machines.... > It seems as if there is a need to extend the pip+wheel+PyPI system > before this can fully work for numpy. Maybe, in this case, but with the whole fortran ABI thing, yes. > You mentioned in another message that a post-install script seems best > to you. What would really be best is run-time selection of the appropriate lib -- it would solve this problem, and allow users to re-distribute working binaries via py2exe, etc. And not require opening a security hole in wheels... Not sure how hard that would be to do, though. > 3) Upload wheels for Windows to somewhere other than PyPI e.g. > SourceForge pending a distribution solution that can detect SSE > support on Windows. The hard-core "I want to use python instead of matlab" users are being re-directed to Anaconda or Canopy anyway. So maybe sub-optimal binaries on pypi is OK. By the way, anyone know what Anaconda and Canopy do about SSE and a good BLAS? > I think it would be good to have a go at wheels even if they're not > fully ready for PyPI (just in case some other issue surfaces in the > process). Absolutely! - Chris _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig