On 7 December 2013 00:05, Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 December 2013 13:54, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4 December 2013 21:10, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think this is important enough to warrant a "NumPy and the >>> Scientific Python stack" section in the user guide (with Linux distro >>> packages, Windows installers and conda all discussed as options): >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/issue/37/add-a-dedicated-numpy-and-the-scientific >> >> I created a draft of this new section at >> https://bitbucket.org/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/pull-request/12/recommendations-for-numpy-et-al/diff > > It's probably worth listing each of the full scientific Python > distributions on this page (or just linking to it), rather than just > Anaconda: > http://www.scipy.org/install.html
Done! I added a new section on "SciPy distributions" and retitled to the conda section to emphasise the open source package manager over the distribution (since the main point of that section relates to the fact that you can use conda *outside* Anaconda, even if there are still some rough edges to that approach at this point in time). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig