On 7 December 2013 00:05, Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 December 2013 13:54, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4 December 2013 21:10, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think this is important enough to warrant a "NumPy and the
>>> Scientific Python stack" section in the user guide (with Linux distro
>>> packages, Windows installers and conda all discussed as options):
>>>
>>> https://bitbucket.org/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/issue/37/add-a-dedicated-numpy-and-the-scientific
>>
>> I created a draft of this new section at
>> https://bitbucket.org/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/pull-request/12/recommendations-for-numpy-et-al/diff
>
> It's probably worth listing each of the full scientific Python
> distributions on this page (or just linking to it), rather than just
> Anaconda:
> http://www.scipy.org/install.html

Done! I added a new section on "SciPy distributions" and retitled to
the conda section to emphasise the open source package manager over
the distribution (since the main point of that section relates to the
fact that you can use conda *outside* Anaconda, even if there are
still some rough edges to that approach at this point in time).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to