On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 January 2014 12:18, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: >> But more importantly, while I'm against officially supporting importable >> Wheels >> because of various reasons, my biggest problem is that this was added in >> without any chance for discussion. > > Fair point. I'm sure Nick did just think of it as clarification - I > know I did - but the process point is reasonable. I'm happy to leave > off arguing with your position till the point comes for proper debate > ;-) > > Paul Let me be explicit that I don’t think Nick is doing anything nefarious here, I do believe that he probably did think of it as a clarification. I’m concerned with the fact that the PEP did not support this when it was accepted and contained language that, to me at least, is contrary to the fact that this was supported, and then the new text was addd to an already accepted PEP giving it a new feature without any chance for discussion or disagreement. If I wasn’t anal about reading every email that hits my inbox *and* I wasn’t on python-checkins I never would have noticed this addition until it was likely too late to do anything about it because it had been documented as part of the PEP long enough that people started to depend on it. So hopefully nobody thinks I’m calling Nick a bad actor in this case. Also to be specific, what I believe should be done is that the change should be reverted, and if it is desired that Wheels officially support zip import then in the next version of the Wheel spec it should be added when everyone has a chance to properly discuss it. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
