Can you perhaps reproduce this and check the headers? Look for a X-Served-By header. I want to make sure that we don't have a cache with a bad config loaded.
I'm not entirely great at sorting out graphite, but it appears to be like we don't have any elevated error rates except for one spike at ~9:15. I'm not sure what timezone that is in, probably UTC? On May 19, 2014, at 3:39 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 May 2014, at 20:51, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'll take a look at this. We might need to increase the number of allowed >> failures on the health checks. > > FWIW I just got another varnish error (on > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/FormAlchemy/1.4.3 ). A page reload worked > correctly. > > Is there a monitoring system in place that detects these errors? I’m seeing > them reasonably regularly, but I don’t know how useful it is to report them > every time. > > Wichert. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
