> On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 - I think thats a great idea. We've had to pin < setuptools 8 in > the OpenStack ecosystem too.
As far as I’m aware, Openstack is just about ready to unpin setuptools. I believe the only thing holding it back is a pbr change. > > It would have been nice to offer some period of time where the cases > which were going to change would have warned. I realise thats > non-trivial, but this is systemic infrastructure at the core of our > dependency graph - everything that expresses requirements is affected. > > -Rob > > On 16 December 2014 at 07:27, Jim Fulton <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think the changes in version management in setuptools 8 are a great >> step forward, >> but I think the transition is going to hurt a lot. >> >> For buildout, I'm thinking of of releasing 2.3.1 that reverts the >> changes in 2.3 and >> adds a requirement for setuptools <8 to give more time to respond to >> these changes. >> >> Jim >> >> -- >> Jim Fulton >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton >> _______________________________________________ >> Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > > > > -- > Robert Collins <[email protected]> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Converged Cloud > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
