On 22 December 2014 at 20:44, Marcus Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > it would fail. you'd need ">1.7.0" > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:36 PM, James Bennett <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> So, if PyPI has foo-1.7 and foo-1.7.1, does ">1.7" just fail to find >> anything installable?
I think the thing I'd missed, which makes this behaviour more understandable (for me) is that you wouldn't usually get that in reality. Projects tend to use a fixed number of digits in the version number, so it'd likely be 1.7.0 and 1.7.1, and you'd be writing >1.7.0. Thinking of ">1.7" as "greater than the 1.7 series" sort of helps me as well... Paul _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
