On Saturday, January 24, 2015, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
> I've pushed changes to PyPI where it is no longer possible to reuse a > filename > and attempting to do it will give an 400 error that says: > > This filename has previously been used, you should use a different > version. > > This does NOT prevent authors from being allowed to delete files from PyPI, > however if a file is deleted from PyPI it cannot be re-uploaded again. This > means that if you upload say foobar-1.0.tar.gz, and your 1.0 has a mistake > in > it then you *must* issue a new release to correct it. > > --- > Donald Stufft > PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA > > My only concern is that there is no reliable way to test that your README will be parsed correctly. Is there a timeline for switch it to use https://github.com/pypa/readme? I would say majority of the time I do a release of the same version it's because of the fragile rst parsing. If I have to run the risk of bumping versions just to fix a valid restructured text document to fit pypi parsing it'll make releasing a very stressful experience. > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org <javascript:;> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
