> On Mar 5, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Marcus Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I don’t think that an artificial limit on the number of issues or pull 
> requests is a good path forward.
> 
> I would say "reasonable" limit, not "artificial".  :  )
> It's a simple way to balance the efforts towards project maintenance.
> 
>   I feel like if someone doesn’t want to close issues for whatever reasons, 
> trying to force them to do that will just mean they are more likely to choose 
> to spend their time elsewhere.
> 
> the counter argument is that by not responding to issues and PRs, 
> contributers end up going elsewhere.
> 
> 


Sure, but if we spend our time elsewhere they aren’t going to get responses 
either ;)

---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to