On 2 Apr 2015 21:05, "Daniel Holth" <dho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We should do a mode where dependencies come from setup.cfg statically and everything else (setup.py build script) works the same.
I believe that's what Robert Collins pip PR is aimed at providing. It's still quite limited, as the vast majority of projects aren't going to switch to a declarative devdir, hence PEP 426's dependence on generated declarative metadata in the sdist (that way most folks will just be upgrading to a newer setuptools rather than having to switch to a new build toolchain and change their own development practices) Cheers, Nick. > > On Apr 2, 2015 7:02 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 2 April 2015 at 20:27, Thomas Güttler <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >> > I hate the "ORs" and "IFs" in the python packaging world. >> > >> > Can't it be done "condition less"? >> >> Unfortunately, that's currently only possible for programming >> languages tailored primarily for a specific usage domain and with >> relatively young packaging systems that got to benefit (or not) from >> everyone else's software distribution experience without backwards >> compatibility concerns. >> >> > I want a stupid straight forward step by step way. >> >> Aye, so do we, the 17 years of history since distutils was first >> released just makes life a little interesting trying to get there :) >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> >> -- >> Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia >> _______________________________________________ >> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
