On 8 September 2015 at 10:43, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 September 2015 at 03:05, Wes Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sep 5, 2015 11:12 AM, "Donald Stufft" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > This could later be extended to more meta data, such as platform >>> > tags, distribution file types, license info, mirror locations, >>> > documentation, help strings, etc. >> >> RDFa and JSON-LD would make this graph constraint solution solving possible. > > Wes, we know you like these technologies, and want to see us use them > - you don't need to bring them up every time we mention a graphing > problem. They're great candidates to consider integrating into the > metadata 2.0 design, as long as the dependencies for processing them > at runtime aren't too heavy.
I've now filed an issue for that at https://github.com/pypa/interoperability-peps/issues/31 There are also a range of other open issues from my old repo that require review to see if they should be transferred over to the shared repo, or just marked as closed: https://bitbucket.org/pypa/pypi-metadata-formats/issues?status=new&status=open&component=Metadata%202.x Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
