Hello, I’m working on specifying dependencies for a project (IPython) that are dependent on the Python implementation - we want to depend on a package on CPython, but not on PyPy. I see from PEPs 345 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0345/> and 426 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/#environment-markers> and 496 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0496/> that this should be available as platform_python_version environment marker, but when I try to use this in setup.py, it fails, claiming this is an invalid marker (setuptools 18.3.1). I discovered that pkg_resources has its own implementation of environment markers <https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/src/7a705b610abb1177ca169311c4ee261f3e4f0957/pkg_resources/__init__.py?at=18.3.1&fileviewer=file-view-default#__init__.py-1398>, which isn’t consistent with any PEPs describing them. pip uses markerlib, which does seem to implement PEP 345 correctly. The relevant difference in this case is that pkg_resources misspells platform_python_implementation as python_implementation, but it is not the only one. Due to the inconsistent implementations, I don’t think there’s a way to use this environment marker anywhere. It seems like the whole concept of environment markers is experimental, and it would be premature to adopt them for any packages in production. Is this the case?
I found that when I run pip install ., the pkg_resources version is used, and it will balk at the correct platform_python_version as invalid. However, when I build a wheel and try to install it with pip install ipython-...whl, the pip version is used, and it balks at pkg_resources incorrect python_implementation. This conflict makes it impossible to use the marker, as far as I can tell. Has anyone been able to use the python implementation environment marker? I have a PR <https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/pull-requests/147/make-environment-markers-pep-345-compliant/diff> to setuptools to fix what seems to be some inconsistency with the PEPs while preserving the misspelling for backward-compatibility, but it’s not clear which metadata/env marker PEPs setuptools and/or pip are meant to support at this point. It’s also unclear why pkg_resources has its own implementation, instead of all participants using the shared _markerlib, which would at least avoid inconsistency. Thanks, -MinRK
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
