On Oct 26, 2015 6:59 AM, "Wayne Werner" <waynejwer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Thomas Güttler < guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> > I have a dream: For packaging and building package provides only **data**. Data is condition-less: No single "if", "def" or method call. Just data: json or yaml ... >>> > >>> > Even for complex packages. >> >> >> It's a nice dream -- but I think there is more or less a consensus on this list that you really can't do everything completely declaratively. I know I would find it very frustrating to have to hard-code everything up front. > > > I've seen this sentiment mentioned several times... Having only had experience with sdist-style packages which are dead simple to define, do you have any examples of some specific thing that's a pain to do declaratively?
Test the system's implementation of the math.h 'tanh' function to decide whether it correctly implements C99 annex F style handling of edge cases and thus can be used safely, or whether we need to fall back to our internal version of tanh instead, and define some appropriate C preprocessor macros depending on the result. -n
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
