On 30 October 2015 at 16:27, Marcus Smith <qwc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> ================================= >> Whenever a new PEP is put forward on distutils-sig, any PyPA core >> reviewer that believes they are suitably experienced to make the final >> decision on that PEP may offer to serve as the BDFL's delegate (or >> "PEP czar") for that PEP. If their self-nomination is accepted by the >> other PyPA core reviewer, the lead PyPI maintainer and the lead >> CPython representative on distutils-sig, then they will have the >> authority to approve (or reject) that PEP. >> ================================= > > > Nick: > just be clear, if nobody nominates themselves, then you still remain (by > default) the active delegate who's responsible for ruling on a Pypa-related > PEP?
For anything PyPI related, it defaults to being Donald's call as lead maintainer, for other interoperability specs, it defaults to me. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
