Am 17.11.2015 um 13:48 schrieb Donald Stufft:
On Nov 17, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com <mailto:n...@pobox.com>> wrote: On Nov 16, 2015 11:57 PM, "Thomas Güttler" <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de <mailto:guettl...@thomas-guettler.de>> wrote: > > > The job of a dependency is to enable tools like pip [#pip]_ to find the right > > package to install. > > My worries: AFAIK pip is not a library. > > I don't want to re-implement code to handle this pep. > > I would like to re-use. > > But AFAIK pip is not a library. > > I am stupid and don't know how to proceed. > > Please tell me what to do. Presumably there will be a dependency parser added to the 'packaging' library, which already exists as a standard place to stick stuff like this, so you'll just use that. (E.g. it's what pip uses for PEP 440 version parsing today.) https://pypi.python.org/pypi/packaging
Nice, a re-usable library :-) Since I don't see a reason for two implementations, I think the PEP should provide a link to the implementation. Regards, Thomas Güttler -- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
