On 22 January 2016 at 09:31, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Nate Coraor <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nathaniel, Robert, I'm really excited to see how quickly you're making >> progress. A few comments below as I haven't had a chance to catch up on the >> day's discussion: >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Building on the compability lessons learned from these companies, we thus >>> define a baseline ``manylinux1`` platform tag for use by binary Python >>> wheels, and introduce the implementation of preliminary tools to aid in >>> the >>> construction of these ``manylinux1`` wheels. >> >> >> Just a standards question: does this still require an update to PEP 425, or >> would the definition of the manylinux1 platform here supersede that section >> of 425? > > I guess this is a pure process question, so I'll defer to Nick...
I've finally started working on changing the change proposal process, so I'm going to say "No" :) I'll start a separate thread about that, since there are some areas where I'd be interested in people's feedback before I get to far into it. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
