On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Rui Sarmento <rui_sarme...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Ralf, > > Thank you for your suggestions. About the Bartlett test I'm aware that one > of his tests (equal variance of samples) is already available. Nonetheless, > I'm not talking about that particular test but about other Bartlett's test. > The test I wish to contribute is directed to Factor Analysis and is related > to the test for sphericity. I'll try to submit both to the statsmodel. > Ah okay, thanks - learned something new. For Bartlett's sphericity test statsmodels is probably also the best place indeed. Cheers, Ralf > Best Regards, > > Rui > Às 22:46 de 09-09-2016, Ralf Gommers escreveu: > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt < > opensou...@ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote: > >> Hello Rui, >> >> this mailing list deal with tools you can use to publish 3rd party >> packages to something like the pypi package index, >> >> if you want to add to the python stdlib, you need to get started with >> python-ideas, python-dev and very likely write a PEP that will have to get >> accepted. >> >> if you just want to publish your own library, you just need to upload it >> to pypi and make it known. >> >> -- Ronny >> >> On 06.09.2016 17:06, Rui Sarmento wrote: >> >>> Dear Sirs, >>> >>> I've implemented some stats functions related to Factor Analysis in the >>> statistics area. Specifically, the KMO test and the Bartlett test also. At >>> this time I do not seem to find any module performing these tests. Is there >>> any chance I could add these functions to a package in Python. What is the >>> procedure to perform such contribution. >>> >> > Barlett is already implemented in SciPy: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/ > scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.bartlett.html > > KMO isn't available anywhere as far as I can tell; statsmodels would be > the best place if you would like to contribute your implementation there. > See http://statsmodels.sourceforge.net/devel/dev/ for how to go about > that. I wouldn't bother proposing that for stdlib inclusion, it's way too > specialized for that. > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > >>> Thank you very much in advance for the suggestions. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Rui >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >> > > >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
