On 20 July 2017 at 10:46, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > To make this concrete: I'm *pretty* sure (?) that at this point all > the basic elements in my "simplified" rewrite are things that we now > have consensus are needed in some form, so maybe we can use that as a > kind of "minimal core" reference point: > > https://github.com/njsmith/peps/commits/517-refactor-streamline/pep-0517.txt
I don't have time this week to look at this, sorry, but a couple of points: 1) This links to a commit in your repo, not to the actual document. Also, I'd *really* prefer a rendered version if I'm going to review this. However, 2) I'd much rather if we're going for a "stop and take stock" style of reset, that we base that off what's currently in the official version of the PEP. Trying to read a new document and identify the differences from the working version is both time consuming and error prone. I don't think there's any reason that any of your questions wouldn't just as reasonably apply to the official version of the PEP. Sorry I don't have time to say anything further at this point. Paul _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
