Neat On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:25 PM Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk> wrote:
> To pick up the caching discussion again, I've started to experiment with > a couple of different caching techniques. > > The headline results: a cold-start scan of entry points goes from about > 4.5 seconds with no caching, to 0.45 seconds with caching. There's only > a small difference (for me) between having a cache file per sys.path > directory and a single per-user cache file. I've posted lots more > details here: https://github.com/takluyver/entrypoints/issues/16 > > I keep my sys.path quite short, and the difference between the two > approaches presumably increases the more sys.path entries you have. If > anyone has time to test the different techniques, I'd be interested to > know what your results look like. I've put (Linux) instructions on the > same issue. > > If you'd like to try with a different format or caching mechanism, feel > free to add some scripts and see how they compare. > > I haven't yet tried to integrate either technique into the entrypoints > module. > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
