On 6 December 2017 at 02:39, Dustin Ingram <dustin.ing...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd appreciate your feedback on the following Metadata 1.3 PEP. > > The goal here is not to provide a full specification for all fields as > in previous PEPs, but to: > > * Motivate and describe the addition of the new fields or changes to > existing fields; > * Point to the Core Metadata Specifications reference document as the > canonical source for the specification.
Hi folks, While I'd normally step up as BDFL-Delegate for an interoperability specification like this one, I'm actually going to be offline for most of the rest of the year, which I figure wouldn't be especially conducive to running an effective and timely review process :) So while I'll note that I'm personally happy with the PEP as it currently stands (based on my review of Dustin's earlier drafts), I've also asked Daniel Holth if he'd be willing to handle the task of final review and approval for this PEP as the original author of the wheel specification, and Daniel's graciously agreed to do so. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
