On 29 January 2018 at 19:35, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 January 2018 at 04:45, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 29 January 2018 at 11:54, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> 
>> wrote:
>>> It won't be testable by most developers, if be inclined to say that making
>>> the VCS layer a supported plugin point would be a better patch to merge.
>>> That would be testable.
>>
>> Right, I suspect without that, the Perforce support would end up
>> intermittently broken, since pre-merge CI wouldn't be able to cover
>> it.
>
> The existing PR does actually include tests that install and verify
> Perforce functionality. I don't follow all the details, but the intent
> is definitely there - Barney has done a good job with the PR.

If the functionality can be tested in Travis, then I'd say go for it,
and don't worry about gating it behind defining a stable plugin API
that 3rd party projects can implement.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to