I accept PEP 566. Thank you for doing this work.

Daniel

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM Dustin Ingram <di@di.codes> wrote:

> I've updated the PEP to include the message body as Description.
>
>   https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0566/
>
> I don't think there are any other outstanding issues, so this should
> be ready for Daniel's review.
>
> Thanks,
> D.
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Trishank Kuppusamy
> <trishank.kuppus...@datadoghq.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Daniel Holth <dho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hashes do not belong in this PEP, which is intended to do just a little
> >> more than document the status quo. The document does provide for future
> >> enhancements to the spec without using the PEP process.
> >>
> >> Personally I am not a fan of putting concrete requirements or hashes of
> >> specific archives at this level.
> >
> >
> > Fair enough, just throwing the idea out there!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to