On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, 13:03 Nick Coghlan, <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Some time ago, we adjusted the distutils-sig PEP approval process to > include a "Provisional" status, where we approved changes for > inclusion in the reference implementations (typically pip and > setuptools), but still reserved the right to make adjustments if > practical experience showed that we'd missed something critical. > > Earlier today, I merged the amendment to PEP 1 that makes that part of > the Python Enhancement Proposal process in general, and explicitly > marked the affected PEPs as Provisional. > > For distutils-sig, that update affects both of the pyproject.toml PEPs > (although I expect PEP 518 isn't too far off being marked as Final - > the question of the precise meaning of a missing build-system table > when pyproject.toml is present seems to be the only underspecified > point that anyone has found during the Provisional period). >
Should we be marking PEP 517 as provisional? > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > -- > Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/SZDYU3VKNS4RYH3JPEYVXYSDT4YCQSQD/ >
-- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/3AAWQVM7BBKVWGHOH23N5FTE43P6GC6H/
