I have updated PEP 518: https://github.com/python/peps/commit/af73627e587c25b9ac6f28a0fda01953252df391#diff-f068c801ccb40fad40c0436ff1e25e3f .
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 03:29 Bernat Gabor <gaborjber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fair enough :+1: Let's go ahead with this then. > > > For tools (such as pip) where 2a and 2b behave differently, yes it > would. But that's a pip implementation decision which can be made > independently of the resolution of this discussion (the PEP allows either > behaviour). The details of pip's behaviour have been discussed both on this > thread and on the related pip issue that's referenced in this thread. I > don't think it's worth rehashing that discussion again here. If you want to > argue that pip should switch to behaviour 2a, you should pick up the > discussion on the pip issue tracker. But be warned, I'll argue against you > over there :-) (Not least because the legacy behaviour is available using > --no-build-isolation, which is *precisely* for the case where you want to > manage the build tools manually the way you are doing above). > -- > Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/46N2F7WWSGMIQ4JHYKLW424NRQ3QPPGK/ >
-- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/YY5GSSWU52HDGU3I3NVRSWRGU2QA4G4D/
