It's generally easiest to find a maintainer who has an established track record to adopt the project.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > I love Debian. I've been a loyal user for twenty years. But Debian is > > really bad at coping with software that needs to react quickly to > changing > > external conditions, or that depends on a tight feedback loop between > users > > and developers. (Indeed, Debian's whole value-add is to insert themselves > > as a buffer between users and developers, which is great in some > situations > > but terrible in others.) > > > > Maybe if certbot worked hard enough they could arrange to get special > > treatment like Firefox or clamav or something, but in their position I > > would see this as a total non-starter. Even if they did somehow manage to > > navigate Debian's politics, they'd still have to go and repeat the > process > > for Redhat, SuSE, Ubuntu, Gentoo, ... > > I wouldn't be too put off by the idea of Debian politics. Certbot should > be a good fit for stable-updates: > https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates > under the "Packages that need to be current to be useful" criterion listed > at https://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110215 > > -M- > -- > Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ > Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/ > archives/list/[email protected]/message/ > EGMGR2HFKJOPANXPORLSLNDRTYVB3FOM/ >
-- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/Y4OBW44DFNHDHZ6ZI524FDAYXGDC4J4U/
