On 30 July 2018 at 23:01, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I see that there is almost no mention of private packages index in the > packaging guide, and no recommendation on what to use. > > Currently googling for private packages mostly return obsolete (and not very > practical) recommendations based on dependency links. > > In 2018, what would be the recommended practices for teams that develop > private packages that depend on each other ?
That's a very good point, and I think it would be a really useful addition to the packaging guide. I believe the most commonly recommended approach is to use a local,devpi instance as a private index, but in terms of development workflow around that basis, I don't really know that there's much in the way of a consensus. (I should say that I don't work in an environment like this myself, so my comments are based purely on what I've heard, not on personal experience). Paul -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/QVRQV2MILNRNWZOUXLHTTSS6U5HY3WTA/
