> On Sep 20, 2018, at 12:42, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 20, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Bert JW Regeer <xiste...@0x58.com
>> <mailto:xiste...@0x58.com>> wrote:
>>
>> pip not seeing any improvements is something I think will be sad. I don't
>> use pipenv, but use poetry which uses pip behind the scenes to do
>> installation. I also use flit. For either of those cases I would think it
>> sad that pipenv splits from pip, and then developers of alternate tooling
>> around building packages (but not installing) don't get new improvements
>> because "pip is legacy".
>>
>> pipenv doesn't work in various scenarios, and trying to shoehorn it into
>> those scenarios is just wrong especially since it wasn't designed to do
>> those things.
>
> FWIW, I don’t think that anyone is trying to sunset pip.
That's great, however that is not how the previous emails read to me. I'm glad
that is sorted.
--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/UWVZDM3CHNZSJL7M6HREJQ4QKDJK2EKM/
