On 20Feb.2019 0533, Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > As one of the Pipenv maintainers, however, it is my personal opinion that this > PEP would not be end up in the “yet another standard” situation, but even be > beneficial to Pipenv, if done correctly. > > I hope this can provide some confidence :)
I'd love to hear more about how Pipenv would make use of it. So far it's only really been designed with pip in mind (and their team in the discussion), but we've explicitly left it _very_ tool independent. So if you can describe how it would work with Pipenv, that would be helpful for finding things that need changing. Also, the `pythonloc` package is an implementation of this that anyone can try out today - https://pypi.org/project/pythonloc/ (the major difference is that when implemented, you won't have to use "pythonloc" and "piploc" to get the new behaviour). Cheers, Steve -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/distutils-sig@python.org/message/JBEBTV4DBFMQ6GUUJPREFKYTP5TUAKF4/
