Hi,
you were right - two topics had the same ID. Which probably means that one tool
considers the topic ID and the next tools evaluates the href attribute. Anyway
- it is working now.
As for the table borders: I only had this problem in PDF output (created with
XEP). And yes, I used a thicker border. Doesn't look very elegant, but more
deliberate. In RTF and HTML output, the borders were OK using the default
configuration.
Thanks a lot for your help with the map metadata (you can only recognize what's
going on in the address block if you edit in XXE) and with chunking my map.
Best regards
Susanne Muris
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:38:55 +0100
> From: hussein at xmlmind.com
> To: susannecm at hotmail.de
> CC: ditac-support at xmlmind.com
> Subject: RE: RE: [ditac] Relationship table
>
> > I've attached the map I was converting. The topics contain some information
> > that I don't want to disclose.
> > I hope it will be possible to identify the problem without them. If it is
> > not, I could try to reproduce the problem with other files.
> >
>
> I cannot reproduce the problem with your map. I'll send you the results
> I got in a private email.
>
> I've slightly modified your map:
>
> [1] Slightly reformed <addressdetails> because this element is
> whitespace preserving.
> [2] Added chunk="to-content" to one of your topicref.
>
> However, it also worked fine, as expected, before the above modifications.
>
> --> I would say that ditac has no bug here. Please double-check your
> topics. My guess is that you have two topics having the same ID. <--
>
>
>
> > Another remark on my conversion results: My topics include very complicated
> > tables (they have column and row headings, each table is several pages long
> > and needs the entire width of the page, there are cell spans and numerous
> > table footnotes). In sum, ditac handled these tables very well. There were
> > just two minor cosmetic glitches with the default configuration.
> >
> >
> > * If a table spans several pages, column headings are repeated on every
> > page which is perfectly fine. But in this case, the repeated headings do
> > not have a top border which looks a bit weird.
>
> There is nothing we can do to fix that. It's the XSL-FO processor (e.g.
> FOP, XEP or XFC) which generates the repeated headings.
>
> (On a second thought, may be the table border is not thick enough?)
>
>
>
>
> > * Column and row headings are rendered in bold character style which is
> > fine too. But if there are table footnotes in these cells, the footnote
> > number in the cell and the entire footnote text below the table inherit the
> > bold formatting which probably isn't what you usually want.
>
> We'll fix this in next release.
>
>
>
> >
> > I could fix this easily in a custom styleheet so I don't need any help on
> > this. Just thought I let you know ...
>
> Thank you very much for your feedback!
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M1002xIMVideochat2
Schau mir in die Augen, Kleines: Chatte mit der Liebsten per Video.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.xmlmind.com/pipermail/ditac-support/attachments/20100217/39e8d932/attachment-0001.htm
