This is a documented limitation.
See http://www.xmlmind.com/ditac/_distrib/doc/manual/limitations.html
---
Attribute collection-type, whatever its value, is ignored inside the
reltable element.
---
We do not plan to remove this limitation.
Please specify this:
<reltable>
<relrow>
<relcell>
<topicref href="topics/a.dita" type="concept"/>
</relcell>
<relcell>
<topicref href="topics/b.dita" type="concept"/>
</relcell>
<relcell>
<topicref href="topics/c.dita" type="concept"/>
</relcell>
</relrow>
</reltable>
In our opinion, the above specification is closer the concept of
reltables, i.e. ``more intuitive'', than what you did.
On 01/14/2013 02:38 AM, Lea Hayes wrote:
I am trying to create a relationship between a group of concepts using
the following relationship table:
|<reltable>
<relrow>
<relcell>
<topicgroup collection-type="family">
<topicref href="topics/a.dita" type="concept"/>
<topicref href="topics/b.dita" type="concept"/>
<topicref href="topics/c.dita" type="concept"/>
</topicgroup>
</relcell>
</relrow>
</reltable>|
This, however, does not do anything at all. The expected output is:
A ...
Related Concepts
* B
* C
The following technique works as expected, but this doesn't seem like
the correct solution:
|<reltable>
<relrow>
<relcell>
<topicgroup collection-type="family">
<topicref href="topics/a.dita" type="concept"/>
<topicref href="topics/b.dita" type="concept"/>
<topicref href="topics/c.dita" type="concept"/>
</topicgroup>
</relcell>
<relcell>
<topicgroup collection-type="family">
<topicref href="topics/a.dita" type="concept"/>
<topicref href="topics/b.dita" type="concept"/>
<topicref href="topics/c.dita" type="concept"/>
</topicgroup>
</relcell>
</relrow>
</reltable>|
Having read many DITA resources on this topic it seems that I am doing
this the correct way. For example see,
http://dita.xml.org/improving-relationships-relationship-tables.
Am I doing this wrong or is this a bug?
--
XMLmind DITA Converter Support List
[email protected]
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/ditac-support
