Solving for the concept that we should use reliable information. We could use Google scholar, there are academic and research materials available to everyone.
On Tue, May 21, 2019, 5:43 PM Patricia Shanahan <[email protected]> wrote: > Another option is to quote from the abstract of a paywall article, which > will give the main conclusions. The plus is that abstracts are generally > free. The minus is that a lot of the detail needed to evaluate a study > is missing. > > On 5/21/2019 5:25 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > Pay wall... No. It's of no use if people can't get to it. > > > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Patricia Shanahan <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 5:15:46 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: FAQ and paywall articles > > > > I am sure all of us have heard of some of the studies of bias based only > > on knowing a name. I would like to support FAQ answers with the original > > research, not third-hand reports. I know how much information gets > > simplified and distorted. > > > > Most of the apparently interesting articles are published in journals > > that charge in various ways for access. > > > > 1. If you know of good FAQ-relevant references that are not paywall, > > please send links. > > > > 2. It is OK for me to quote from paywall articles? I can get access for > > myself, by paying or going to a university library, and quote within the > > limits of fair use. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
