> -----Original Message----- > From: John Merrells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:17 PM > To: Dan Connolly > Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [dix] Re: on the dix: URI scheme for DIX/SXIP > > > On 17-Mar-06, at 1:29 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > Section 7 of http://dixs.org/index.php/Draft-merrells-dix-01.txt > > says "This document has no IANA Actions." but section > 3.2.6. DIX URI > > Namespace introduces a new URI scheme. > > My understanding of this is that because the document is an > individual submission and not a working group document that > there can be no IANA actions from it. If it were a working > group document then this document would have to call out > 'dix' registration as an action. > > I'm happy to add a comment to the draft to make that clearer though.
Individual submission drafts can have IANA actions. It happens all the time. I do agree that minting a URI scheme is probably not a good idea if other alternatives are available. -Scott- _______________________________________________ dix mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
