On 17-Mar-06, at 1:29 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
I note the draft doesn't include a normative reference to any HTML
specifications. Please
add one.
Yes, my error. I will add to the next draft.
Also, the proposed charter ( http://dixs.org/index.php/
DIX_Charter ) does not make
any connection to HTML. Please add something to note that use of
HTML syntax,
especially extensibility mechanisms like rel and profile, is in
scope, in order to attract
review from relevant experts.
That might be presumptive... the charter only mentions HTML in the
context of a
HTTP transport binding and then only as an example way of encoding a
message.
The current interest in improving/extending/fixing HTTP-AUTH comes to
mind as
a possible alternative/substitute mechanism.
John
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
