>From my perspective, there's been little visibility into how things are going with the other channels related official projects. Who are the other maintainers there? I would present this question to those people (hopefully there are some others by now?) rather than to the Django maintainers which is who I think of when you say "Django core" (a term we're trying to replace with "Technical team" and "Technical advisory team" [0]). Organizationally, I think it could be nice if channels has its own technical team rather than giving the impression that the Django maintainers are also stewarding all other official projects.
[0] https://www.djangoproject.com/foundation/teams/ On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 9:22:30 PM UTC-4, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > Hi Artem, > > Thanks for adding the comments - it does look better. The thing I would > like to have is more feedback from Django core about this; I've not heard > anyone's opinion but mine, and I am not entirely sure if we should do this > (I am also not entirely sure asgi_ipc should be a Django project some days). > > Andrew > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Artem Malyshev <proof...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> I'm very glad to hear it's considered useful. If you look at recent >> master you can see that I've added documentation and comments to the code. >> >> Exact commit >> https://github.com/proofit404/asgi_rabbitmq/commit/9add0b8fec10ff93f8a813838f4f8ad87fde7e1f >> >> Also, I found the second maintainer for the project, Andrii Soldatenko. >> He is in the mail carbon copy. >> >> Any insights what to do next? >> >> Regards, Artem. >> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 4:08:20 AM UTC+3, Andrew Godwin wrote: >>> >>> Hi Artem, >>> >>> I know we've discussed this privately but I want to put some things on >>> the public list (and get at least one reply). >>> >>> My view is that it would be useful to have it maintained, but I do not >>> personally have the spare time to help maintain it, so it would need at >>> least one other person to help you maintain it before we could accept it >>> (they would not have to be existing core, but would need some history of >>> open-source maintenance) >>> >>> The other thing would be to see the existing code have more comments and >>> documentation; currently it has very few comments, in particular. >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Artem Malyshev <proof...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> asgi_rabbitmq is Channels layer on top of RabbitMQ. It was originally >>>> developed as part of Mozilla funding program. >>>> >>>> I've complete few major milestones after this. Now it's used in few >>>> production systems. It implements the ASGI specification exactly and >>>> performs well. >>>> >>>> I want to make asgi_rabbitmq an official Django project. >>>> >>>> Reasons why I want this happens: >>>> >>>> - It will be widely used. Major changes in the Channels and ASGI will >>>> take this library into account. >>>> >>>> We need: >>>> >>>> - Discuss if it's interesting at all for Django project. Find at least >>>> one more person who understands library code. Documentation has a >>>> comprehensive chapter about internal design and implementation. >>>> >>>> Conditions under which I prefer it happens: >>>> >>>> - I want to keep commit access for this repository for future >>>> development and fixes. - I'll keep it up to date with coming channels >>>> releases. - I'll do initial preparation steps for code transfer like code >>>> clean up if necessary. But I need receive some comments after code review. >>>> >>>> Project repository: https://github.com/proofit404/asgi_rabbitmq >>>> >>>> Regards, Artem. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com. >>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/69328d61-68fd-47b8-8f1b-a4f0cc85f7cf%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/69328d61-68fd-47b8-8f1b-a4f0cc85f7cf%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to django-d...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/d232cdec-ff7b-4e0c-a2bd-d5d086ca7f68%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/d232cdec-ff7b-4e0c-a2bd-d5d086ca7f68%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/6106d7df-da7c-403f-8ac7-164915096712%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
