#2417: Support for binary type fields (aka: bytea in postgres and VARBINARY in
mysql)
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Owner:  jacob   
     Type:  enhancement          |       Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal               |    Milestone:          
Component:  Database wrapper     |      Version:          
 Severity:  normal               |   Resolution:          
 Keywords:  binary type field    |  
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 Could we consider using LARGE_BLOB as the default type for MySQL (and
 ado_mssql, I guess), so that there's not a 64k limit on the size, by
 default. I realize your application is specifically for small bits of
 binary data, but if there's only going to be one binary type, it should be
 as flexible as possible.
 
 Also, I'm not sure about extending CharField. As I mentioned in an email
 to django-developers, that means you show up in the admin, and I have to
 agree with Malcolm that it's probably not a good thing to just display
 random binary data. I'm not sure what the best way to allow binary input
 is, but maybe using hex, as you mentioned in the patch, is an option. At
 any rate, I'm not sure BinaryField should inherit from any currently
 defined field type.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2417>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.org/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to