#18144: MD5PasswordHasher: broken backwards compatibility with empty salt
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  apreobrazhensky@…    |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  contrib.auth         |                  Version:  1.4
     Severity:  Release blocker      |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  MD5PasswordHasher    |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
  check_password salt                |      Needs documentation:  0
    Has patch:  1                    |  Patch needs improvement:  1
  Needs tests:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by aaugustin):

 I just realized "unsalted passwords" can mean two things: just a plain
 SHA1 hash, or `sha1$$` followed by a SHA1 hash. The request here is to
 handle the latter. Historically, Django hasn't checked that the salt isn't
 empty; now it does, and that's described as a regression here.

 Django never generated such hashes and there's no reason to find them in a
 auth_user table. But that argument also applies to hashes starting with
 `md5$$`, and code was added to support that.

 Personally I would have wontfix'd the ticket rather that add code to
 support dubious schemes that Django never generated. But it would be
 inconsistent to refuse for SHA1 what was accepted for MD5, so at this
 point, I'll refrain from closing the ticket or changing its "release
 blocker" status.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18144#comment:19>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to