#7028: Better raw_id_fields feedback in newform-admins branch
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Marcob | Owner: nobody
<marcoberi@…> | Status: new
Type: New feature | Version: master
Component: contrib.admin | Resolution:
Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted
Keywords: raw-id-fields nfa- | Needs documentation: 0
someday design_ux | Patch needs improvement: 1
Has patch: 1 | UI/UX: 1
Needs tests: 1 |
Easy pickings: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by julien):
I've worked on a reasonably straightforward implementation (1) for this
inspired from DrMeers' "cooked_ids" (2). I've also written a number of
selenium tests. It has the advantage of preserving raw_id_fields if you
still want them (for whatever reason), while allowing you to use the more
user-friendly version (here called "token_fields").
The main piece that's still missing from this implementation is the
ability to work with non-integer primary keys.
Any feedback?
(1) https://bitbucket.org/drmeers/django-
generic/src/bd20113dce83a5ba6db30a96f0493b93e3aeea17/generic/admin/mixins/cooking.py
(2)
https://github.com/jphalip/django/compare/django:04489c7dbf8f69de84ca272a0a1710e7b6067e9d...ticket-7028
-token-fields
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7028#comment:74>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/086.3d03aad8050821d62950559c772ffddd%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
