#21461: Add pre_update and post_update signals
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: loic84 | Owner: loic84
Type: New feature | Status: assigned
Component: Database layer | Version: master
(models, ORM) | Resolution:
Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted
Keywords: | Needs documentation: 0
Has patch: 1 | Patch needs improvement: 1
Needs tests: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Easy pickings: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by bendavis78):
* cc: bendavis78 (added)
Comment:
Yeah, you're right, using the dict is a messy way to solve the problem. I
guess idea was to put the onus of "type" handling on the pre_save &
post_save. Ideally the update() method would be agnostic regarding the
payloads being passed between the signals. I think you've got the right
idea with using `sender`, though I don't think the API should be
prescribing those types (ie pks vs querysets).
Not sure what the right answer is at this point -- maybe someone will come
up with a more elegant approach.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21461#comment:15>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/064.e0e8eb37442bd03aad6ecba4f71d367b%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.