#22022: Allow field subclasses to require additional SQL
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  mjtamlyn             |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |               Resolution:
     Severity:  Normal               |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
     Keywords:                       |      Needs documentation:  0
    Has patch:  1                    |  Patch needs improvement:  1
  Needs tests:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by nemesisdesign:

Old description:

> '''Problem'''
>
> In postgres, a number of data types require a specific extension to be
> installed. We have one instance of this in core at present, which is the
> `postgis` extension. Our documentation recommends[1] (in postgres 9.1+)
> that you explicitly create the extension in your primary database by
> hand, and then we customise the `_create_test_db` method on the postgis
> database backend to ensure the test database has the relevant extensions
> installed.
>
> Other third party apps[2] recommend adding the extension to the template
> to ensure it's present in tests.
>
> I wish to avoid adding a custom backend to d.c.postgres if at all
> possible, especially as using it in conjunction with gis should be
> permissible. Consequently, I'd like if possible for model fields to have
> `pre_create_sql` to allow each individual field to create the extensions
> as needed. The same mechanism could also be used for a user defined
> custom field to create functions which could then be used as a custom
> transform object.
>
> This feature will be useful for:
> 1) one part of the de-hack-gis project
> 2) hstore
> 3) citext, trigrams, generating uuids database side and other possible
> future features of d.c.postgres
>
> I've written a draft patch[3]. It probably needs some work (hence patch
> needs improvement) but an initial review of the names and code layout
> would be useful.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/ref/contrib/gis/install/postgis/#creating-a
> -spatial-database-with-postgis-2-0-and-postgresql-9-1
> [2] https://github.com/djangonauts/django-hstore#running-the-tests
> [3] https://github.com/django/django/pull/2266

New description:

 '''Problem'''

 In postgres, a number of data types require a specific extension to be
 installed. We have one instance of this in core at present, which is the
 `postgis` extension. Our documentation recommends[1] (in postgres 9.1+)
 that you explicitly create the extension in your primary database by hand,
 and then we customise the `_create_test_db` method on the postgis database
 backend to ensure the test database has the relevant extensions installed.

 Other third party apps[2] recommend adding the extension to the template
 to ensure it's present in tests.

 I wish to avoid adding a custom backend to d.c.postgres if at all
 possible, especially as using it in conjunction with gis should be
 permissible. Consequently, I'd like if possible for model fields to have
 `pre_create_sql` to allow each individual field to create the extensions
 as needed. The same mechanism could also be used for a user defined custom
 field to create functions which could then be used as a custom transform
 object.

 This feature will be useful for:
 1) one part of the de-hack-gis project
 2) hstore
 3) citext, trigrams, generating uuids database side and other possible
 future features of d.c.postgres

 I've written a draft patch[3]. It probably needs some work (hence patch
 needs improvement) but an initial review of the names and code layout
 would be useful.

 [1]
 
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/ref/contrib/gis/install/postgis/#creating-a
 -spatial-database-with-postgis-2-0-and-postgresql-9-1
 [2] http://djangonauts.github.io/django-hstore/#_running_tests
 [3] https://github.com/django/django/pull/2266

--

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/22022#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.32fcd765e0f68f411d14fa0a2f9af0bb%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to