#24386: Querysets with filters and exclusions based on deep relations build 
invalid
queries
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  rtpg                 |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  1                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by shaib):

 * needs_better_patch:   => 0
 * stage:  Unreviewed => Accepted
 * needs_tests:   => 1
 * needs_docs:   => 0


Comment:

 Accepting based on details in report, didn't reproduce myself.

 Just wanted to note for the submitter that even without the bug, the query
 you wrote would not achieve the stated goals -- it would return no
 employees. To do what you intended, you need to replace your `lte` with
 `lt`. Also, another approach for this relies on annotations (annotate
 employee with `Min(owner__employee__startdate)` and filter on that).

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24386#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/062.20374addadd8c3490f4ab212207843a3%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to