#24446: ATOMIC_REQUESTS add extra queries if the view was already in a 
transaction
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  diox                 |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by aaugustin):

 * needs_better_patch:   => 0
 * needs_tests:   => 0
 * needs_docs:   => 0


Comment:

 I discussed this with diox yesterday on IRC and suggested this patch which
 appears to fix the issue:

 {{{
 diff --git a/django/core/handlers/base.py b/django/core/handlers/base.py
 index e40eb2f..92ad394 100644
 --- a/django/core/handlers/base.py
 +++ b/django/core/handlers/base.py
 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ class BaseHandler(object):
          for db in connections.all():
              if (db.settings_dict['ATOMIC_REQUESTS']
                      and db.alias not in non_atomic_requests):
 -                view = transaction.atomic(using=db.alias)(view)
 +                view = transaction.atomic(using=db.alias,
 savepoint=False)(view)
          return view

      def get_exception_response(self, request, resolver, status_code):
 }}}

 I think this change is for the better, however there's a potential for
 backwards incompatibility. If some developers went through the pain of
 adding 2 to all their `assertNumQueries`, forcing them to substract 2
 again isn't nice...

 That said, if I remember correctly, I had found a solution during the
 transaction refactor to avoid breaking `assertNumQueries`, so I'm not sure
 why diox is seeing this issue.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24446#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/062.125cfec04420682dcb589ffcde3bfdac%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to