#21961: ForeignKey.on_delete supports database-level cascading options
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Xof                  |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by carljm):

 I think we should consider introducing this feature as a totally separate
 kwarg (`on_delete_db`) rather than conflating it with the existing Python-
 level `on_delete`. The various edge cases and implicit fallbacks in the
 existing proposal worry me, and I think it would be better to be more
 explicit and clear about what is happening on the database level vs the
 Python level.

 Right now the contract of `on_delete` is very simple: it takes a Python
 callable which will be called when a delete cascades. There is nothing at
 all special about the built-in callables, they are just conveniences for
 common cases. The current API proposal complicates that contract
 dramatically: now you have an `on_delete` kwarg which sometimes accepts
 Python callables but can also accept magical constants which do something
 entirely different (and also have an implicit fallback relationship with
 one of the built-in callables).

 So under my proposal, if you want database-level cascade, you would
 specify `on_delete=models.DO_NOTHING, on_delete_db=models.DB_CASCADE` or
 similar. Sure this is a bit more verbose, but I think that's worth it for
 the gains in clarity and simplicity.

 For similar reasons, I feel pretty strongly that we should NOT
 automatically fallback from db-cascade to non-db-cascade depending on the
 backend capabilities. It introduces too many differences in behavior
 depending on db backend. Trying to claim to provide cross-db portability
 when we can't really do so consistently is worse than simply not claiming
 to provide it at all. DB-level cascade (like many other "advanced" db-
 level features) is something you should only take advantage of when you
 know your code will be running on a database that supports it, full stop.
 Use of `on_delete_db` on a backend that can't support it should be an
 error.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21961#comment:9>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/061.c24df0a2a674b2edbe08e6ea27d7a920%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to