#25263: How closely we should adhere to PEP 257
--------------------------------------+--------------------
     Reporter:  techdragon            |      Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Cleanup/optimization  |     Status:  new
    Component:  Documentation         |    Version:  master
     Severity:  Normal                |   Keywords:
 Triage Stage:  Unreviewed            |  Has patch:  0
Easy pickings:  0                     |      UI/UX:  0
--------------------------------------+--------------------
 Currently the documentation contained in Django's source code has many
 places where it could be improved, most significantly by having more of
 it. In order to help discover undocumented code, I ran PEP 257 on the
 entire project. The thousands of warnings were quite a shock and it was
 pretty obvious that a pull request for all of the changes would be too
 large.

 It seemed like a good idea to open this ticket and find out if continuing
 to create new tickets and pull requests for more of this kind of
 documentation improvement is in line with the overall project code
 standards. I'm opening a pull request that contains a partial cleanup of
 the existing documentation inside 'django.views'.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25263>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/053.e1f1a62ad497c482e14996fd2b1cfa0e%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to