#26820: Reverse join in `exclude` fails when GenericRelation is defined on an
abstract model
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: sbussetti | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: closed
Component: | Version: 1.9
contrib.contenttypes |
Severity: Normal | Resolution: duplicate
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by timgraham):
* status: new => closed
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* component: Database layer (models, ORM) => contrib.contenttypes
* needs_tests: => 0
* needs_docs: => 0
* resolution: => duplicate
Comment:
Looks like a duplicate of #26261. If you want to add an additional
regression on that ticket test similar to
https://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/26261/26261-test.diff
just to be sure, that would be great.
I'd do it myself but the report is a bit confusing since you say "exact
same use case and setup as #20378" but then the example query uses a
`Comment` model which isn't part of that ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26820#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/067.4a964aad609692bfe4c4da3b617c3063%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
