#28806: Mechanism of fetching related objects violates READ COMMITTED 
assumption of
Django ORM
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
               Reporter:  Aaron Tan  |          Owner:  nobody
                   Type:  Bug        |         Status:  new
              Component:  Database   |        Version:  master
  layer (models, ORM)                |       Keywords:  database, read-
               Severity:  Normal     |  committed, concurrency control
           Triage Stage:             |      Has patch:  0
  Unreviewed                         |
    Needs documentation:  0          |    Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  0          |  Easy pickings:  0
                  UI/UX:  0          |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Found here:
 
https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/fields/related_descriptors.py#L141.
 {{{
 def get_object(self, instance):
         qs = self.get_queryset(instance=instance)
         # Assuming the database enforces foreign keys, this won't fail.
         return qs.get(self.field.get_reverse_related_filter(instance))
 }}}


 The comment in that function states: `# Assuming the database enforces
 foreign keys, this won't fail.`, but it's not the case. I will illustrate
 with a use case we met:

 Suppose we have 2 concurrent transactions A and B talking to the same
 Postgresql backend, and we have two models:
 {{{
 class Foo:
     pass

 class Bar:
     fk = ForeignKey(Foo, on_delete=models.SET_NULL)
 }}}
 populated by objects
 {{{
 foo = Foo()
 foo.save()
 bar = Bar(fk=foo)
 bar.save()
 }}}
 Transaction A runs
 {{{
 bar = Bar.objects.get(pk=<bar's pk>)
 }}}
 Then transaction B runs
 {{{
 Foo.objects.get(pk=<foo's pk>).delete()
 }}}
 If READ COMMITTED is assumed by Django, transaction A will see the db
 snapshot with `foo` deleted. But if transaction A subsequently did
 {{{
 bar.fk #Access foreign key field `fk` for the first time
 }}}

 Because the `get_object` method linked does not catch `ObjectDoesNotExist`
 exception tossed by `get`, the last `bar.fk` will raise
 `ObjectDoesNotExist`, thus contradicts the assumption

 > the database enforces foreign keys, this won't fail.

 We currently manually catch `ObjectDoesNotExist` but that makes code ugly,
 I suggest instantiate the related field to `None` in that case, instead of
 raising exception.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28806>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/052.eaa772e2bf7b6e528df1ebd625031b18%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to