#17664: {% if %} template tag silences exceptions inconsistently -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Tai Lee | Owner: Robert | Roskam Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: Template system | Version: master Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: smart if tag | Triage Stage: Accepted queryset exception silenced | Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Jon Dufresne): > I think the choice to let boolean operations silence exceptions was a mistake. I think we should change this. I agree. Boolean conditions often hide private data. In the case of a programming mistake, I'd prefer an exception thrown so the programmer can fix it instead of plowing ahead with a potentially incorrect condition. Depending on the template, assuming a value could display private data to the wrong user. > So the intermediate step might be to raise a warning in the console for a minor version that exceptions will stopped being coerced to False soon. +1 This approach sounds sensible to me. -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17664#comment:23> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/067.8544a6f3db3fc6b70dc31d53d2eee960%40djangoproject.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.