#29643: Hashing list in Q objects when using __in lookup
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  rhyre                |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Uncategorized        |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Utilities            |                  Version:  2.0
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  hash, tuple, list,   |             Triage Stage:
  drf                                |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Carlton Gibson):

 Hi. Thanks for the follow-up.

 This still isn’t really a minimal reproduce.

 Can you provide a test-case that demonstrates the issue? Or a small
 project?

 Any chance you could use git bisect to identify the commit which broke
 your usage?

 > Without DRF it seems to work just fine. There is a problem with
 serialization

 What exactly do you mean here? It’s not quite clear. (Do you mean that the
 ORM call works fine until embedded with the DRF request-response handling?
 If so you’ll need to provide a sample project I think…(?))

 Could you paste the entire traceback for the error?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29643#comment:4>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/063.e81ec5084606641861c136df25670381%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to