#29994: Document performance issues in FileBasedCache
--------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: matkoniecz | Owner: nobody
Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new
Component: Documentation | Version: 2.1
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
--------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by Tim Graham):
I'm not sure. I think ticket:11260#comment:9 is interesting: "I have
Django sites of tens of thousands of pages running for over 2 years using
the above patches, so your statements about filesystem caching not a
serious strategy are irrelevant." The patch for #11260 is very simple and
seems worth considering if it makes file-based caching usable in
production. Do you have an opinion on that, Grant?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29994#comment:5>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/068.7852ae9e82b7a767b1de3c4697e56880%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
