#30209: Union with group by don't generate correct Subquery
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Nikolas | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: Database layer | Version: master
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: union, group by | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 1
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by TKdka):
Replying to [comment:5 Simon Charette]:
> > I'm planning to make this a sub query pushdown as suggested. FYI, this
is my first contribution to the code base, so suggestions and feedback
would be most appreciated.
>
> TKdka, not to discourage you but this is certainly going to be a hard
first contribution as the ORM doesn't have any formalized API to perform
such pushdown yet. If that can provide you any guidance the most similar
code I can think of is in `django.db.models.sql.Query.get_aggregation`.
Thanks for the guidance and code reference. As nobody else has stepped up
on this in 3 weeks, I'll give it a shot (-:
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30209#comment:6>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/069.93ac112178106e7be427ef7b0ad58555%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.