#30382: force_insert not respected when saving parents
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
               Reporter:  Phill      |          Owner:  nobody
  Tornroth                           |
                   Type:  Bug        |         Status:  new
              Component:  Database   |        Version:  2.2
  layer (models, ORM)                |
               Severity:  Normal     |       Keywords:
           Triage Stage:             |      Has patch:  0
  Unreviewed                         |
    Needs documentation:  0          |    Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  0          |  Easy pickings:  0
                  UI/UX:  0          |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 We're using non-abstract model inheritance (table per model class) and
 issuing our own primary keys. When saving we pass force_insert=True to
 prevent the extra UPDATE statement that precedes the INSERT. The
 force_insert flag is respected on the child table but not on the parent.
 So given:

 {{{
 class ParentModel(models.Model):
     id = models.BigIntegerField(primary_key=True)

 class ChildModel(ParentModel):
     pass

 ChildModel(id=1).save(force_insert=True)
 }}}

 We'll see queries:

 1. UPDATE app_parentmodel  (no rows affected)
 2. INSERT app_parentmodel
 3. INSERT app_childmodel

 This is because Model.save_base doesn't pass force_insert along to
 Model._save_parents, and onto Model._save_table. Doing so would prevent
 the extra UPDATE and respect the spirit of the force_insert feature. This
 is a change I've made locally and seems to work / is pretty
 straightforward. I'm curious though if there's intent behind not carrying
 the force_insert functionality through for parents. I couldn't find any
 discussion on the topic.

 For context about why this is particularly problematic in our case --
 we're using MySQL w/ Innodb and Innodb will take out different exclusive
 locks for the UPDATE and INSERT in question -- so if you're creating new
 ChildModel instances in parallel you can get deadlocks when multiple
 threads issue query #1 and then need a lock with insert intention in order
 to get #2.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30382>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/057.9d6619fbc3dea5e37fdf639004dcced0%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to